On the board path as it runs now (latest_rows -> PM.current -> lines_for), which stage produces each all-zero line: row choice/emptiness, a membership join, p_play, or the share model? And is the object that locks each week the object the board shows?
Owner lane: construction
Question
On the board path as it runs now (latest_rows -> PM.current -> lines_for), which stage produces each all-zero line: row choice/emptiness, a membership join, p_play, or the share model? And is the object that locks each week the object the board shows?
Prediction
Prereg research/scientist/prereg/2026-09-23T2120Z-h114-row-choice.md: control >= 90% agreement; >= 90% of zeros line-stage not p_play; every row from 2025; >= 60% of zero rows empty (falsifier: < 60% -> row-choice story fails); <= 15% team mismatch; >= 50% of zero men who played 2026 carry a non-zero 2026 share; pinning to 2026 gives fewer zeros.
Finding and verdict
PREDICTION WRONG ON THE MECHANISM, MEASURED. 215 of the 222 all-zero lines on the HEAD board replay (97%) are D-95's off-roster stamp (confirmed_active=0: no player_week 2026 on_roster=1 row, matched by resolved name), not an empty row and not p_play. The name key and the player_id key agree on all 215, so there is no crosswalk defect here. 143 of the 215 have a 2026 row and were never on_roster=1 (reserve/PUP/unsigned-to-53), 72 have no 2026 row. Only 7 are model-stage zeros (6 at raw <= MIN_RAW_FOR_SCALE), and 6 of those 7 played in 2026: that small class is H-114's graded 'zero share'. The graded wk2 zero men were NOT D-95 zeros: 17/21 were on_roster in wk1. POST HOC, CONSTRUCTION: pred_2026_w03..w18 were all written once, 2026-09-15 20:40-20:41Z (a312a9e2), and not since. 12 men are locked-to-be zero in the w03 table and non-zero on the 09-20 board, and 10 of them are wk2 graded zero-line men. Week 3 locks from the stale build unless a writer runs first.
Reasoning
Three lanes had asked what the model knew about these men; nobody had asked whether the row was in the frame as a live player at all. The stage census answers that it mostly is not, by design (D-95), and that the object that locks each week is an eight-day-old build.
Next action
Filed a construction row: the week tables w03..w18 are a single 09-15 build that the board has moved past, and w03 locks from it. Test at wk3 grading: graded men locked at 0 in w03 against the board's number at lock. D-95's 18-week reach (an IR man is 0 in the week he returns) is the other half; it needs a week in which a reserve man returns.
Source provenance and publication scope
Owned research record: research/scientist/experiments/2026-09-23T2127Z-h114-row-choice.json
This public reading view includes authored question, finding, review, reasoning and next action fields. Raw measurements, commands, logs and local paths are withheld. The record ID clock is not proof of completion or deployment.