J-01 removed volume_for market terms, so the team pass/rush anchor is now [1, plays_l3, pass_rate_l3]. H-080 bounded recomposing those two windows at -0.123 pass att WITH the market in the design. Without the market, does recomposing the two team windows move the anchor, and does that reach the player line?
Owner lane: s-observation
Question
J-01 removed volume_for market terms, so the team pass/rush anchor is now [1, plays_l3, pass_rate_l3]. H-080 bounded recomposing those two windows at -0.123 pass att WITH the market in the design. Without the market, does recomposing the two team windows move the anchor, and does that reach the player line?
Prediction
P1: the nested pick beats l3 on pass att by -0.10 to -0.30 (interval excludes zero), picking a long memory (ewma h 4-12 or flat 6-8), because without the market the anchor's only team identity is three noisy games. P2 rush: -0.10 to -0.30, excludes zero. C_shuffle worse than A0 by > +0.15 pass. C_const worse than A0. H_hind beats every candidate. Stage 2 (if it runs): fantasy MAE moves by less than 0.01 pts/row in either direction, targets MAE improves by 0.00-0.02 -- the share model absorbs most anchor level via its own team features. I predict nil end to end is the likelier stage-2 outcome. | stage 2 (amendment-1): L1-L0 and L2-L0: fantasy MAE within +-0.01 pts/row, carries MAE -0.000 to -0.010, targets within +-0.005. The rush anchor gain (-0.041 team carries/game, 0.7% of MAE) spread over ~3 carrying players cannot move a per-player MAE by more than ~0.01.
Finding and verdict
REFINED. Anchor: rush recomposition (nested ewma4-8) beats shipped l3 by -0.041 team carries/game Bonf-2 [-0.078,-0.005], 7/7 seasons negative, 0.7% of rush MAE; pass nil (-0.012 [-0.042,+0.019]). Player line: MEASURED NOTHING (fantasy -0.0002 [-0.004,+0.004] Bonf-6, carries +0.0006, targets -0.0004), resolution +-0.004 pts. H-021 end to end remains MEASURED NOTHING; the anchor route of the team windows is now tested.
Reasoning
Premise moved (J-01) so H-080 bound was stale; this is the only team-window route that feeds every player line.
Next action
Anchor route of the 11 team windows: tested, player-line nil. Remaining: the share-tree copies (TEAM_FEATURES, TREND_FEATURES, opp_*) as a MATCHED_BOTH_BALL TEMP team_week shadow; and the pass mix from a script-neutral input (coaching.proe_l4, B lane). The shared-bundle override is a +-0.004 harness for any anchor question (10x finer than a refit arm).
Source provenance and publication scope
Owned research record: research/scientist/experiments/2026-09-26T0624Z-h021-pace-window.json
This public reading view includes authored question, finding, review, reasoning and next action fields. Raw measurements, commands, logs and local paths are withheld. The record ID clock is not proof of completion or deployment.