Status

9 partial · 0 queued for dispatch · 10 assigned awaiting dispatch · 0 fresh task/run markers; markers show reported work, not accepted outcomes. Audit findings and leadership packages are separate scopes; some address related gaps. 6h = recorded acceptances minus reopenings; partial stays open. All 47 IDs and evidence ↗

27 of 47 tracked findings and leadership packages are source-verified complete.

Working on

Close the closed-gate incident repair path, measure storage growth at the next ordinary scorecard refresh, and preserve honest historical input-clock limits while useful products keep running.

Why

A detected failure must reach an owner and a fresh verified repair; a partial control or benchmark cannot count as a repaired product.

Verified progress

One new independent acceptance: CTRL-07 injected missing image and Yahoo cells, routed two findings, then restored both in the real staged renderer through apply-serving; live optimized rank and points remain visible. CTRL-01 and CTRL-02 remain partial because a closed gate blocks the build worker from claiming the related incident. DATA-02 now refuses verified-as-of claims on unknown issuer, lead, walkforward and G4 inputs, but historical clocks and other consumers remain incomplete. OPS-01 safely reuses unchanged cohort reports after unrelated archive growth in focused tests; production growth has not yet been measured. LDR-07 was independently accepted through owner-feedback receipts. No model gain or new live publish is inferred from these controls.

Next

Claude has a tested gate-specific incident dispatch patch proposal and owns implementation plus empty-board missed-grade proof. Verify the first ordinary scorecard refresh for actual reduced writes; retain older reports until reconstruction and references are proved. Continue DATA-02 historical clock acquisition and remaining consumer gates. Accept only completed owner-linked repair receipts.

Contribution to the vision

Convert defects into verified product repairs and durable controls while preserving the useful live product and scientific release gates.

10 partial · 0 queued for dispatch · 10 assigned awaiting dispatch · 0 fresh task/run markers; markers show reported work, not accepted outcomes. Audit findings and leadership packages are separate scopes; some address related gaps. 6h = recorded acceptances minus reopenings; partial stays open. All 47 IDs and evidence ↗

Make Sean's decisions and the employees' work flow through to results he can see.

Working on

Close the remaining unresolved audit and leadership IDs Codex assigned to Claude, each to its written acceptance, while keeping the served product running.

Why

Sean approved 30 items on Friday and 12 never reached a worker because of a selection bug I introduced. Research had produced 69 findings with 0 in the served model. Activity was high and delivered value was not visible.

Verified progress

15:14 → 16:14 MT (2026-09-28): no Claude-owned audit-accountability id closed this hour either; the only commit touching an audit source file (buildsite/audit-accountability.json) remains the pre-existing 4e703594. Canonical accountability still 27/47 (Codex 16/26, Claude 11/21). Nine consecutive build-w5 units (13:15–15:49 MT) held PW-93 correctly DEFERRED under the quiet guard with no new grind.log failure signature; at 15:50 MT Codex rejected the "redispatch has stopped" framing and asked Claude leadership to fix the pre-launch eligibility check itself, and at 15:56 MT a build-w5 unit did: bin/takeable.py gained grind_deferred(), which excludes an item from eligibility when its own automated grind (launchctl com.playerweek.grind, 900s interval) reported a recent, non-stopped, non-done verdict, so PW-93 no longer shows as takeable while a finished/stopped/stale grind item still would. Added a planted-negative test (tests/test_takeable_grind_deferred.py, proven red by disabling the guard, then green), verified via bin/takeable.py 0..7 8 that only shard 5 changed (1→0 takeable) with all seven other shards identical, and ran the full existing takeable/approval/plan-gate suites (one pre-existing, unrelated test_takeable_plan_gate.py failure reproduces identically against HEAD, not touched). Committed 7f4bf37e (bin/takeable.py, tests/test_takeable_grind_deferred.py only) — closes the redispatch loop Codex flagged. Podcast selection-runtime integration remains unapplied by any Claude session; Codex's ready artifact is still alias-receipt correction 806c3204, no new revision this hour. Yahoo-cookie Keychain ACL regression from browser-fix 84e9fa1c (5 open incidents, started ~12:31 MT) is now ~3h42m old, past the 3h escalation bar with no Claude session able to grant the one-time macOS Keychain access itself — escalated to Sean's decide inbox this cycle as claude-hourly-2026092816. Gate OPEN, chain 8/8, board 238/15, plan 127/127, disk free 122Gi/87% used (was 132Gi/86%).

Next

A full Claude session should: (1) apply/adapt Codex's 806c3204 protected podcast-runtime patch (alias-receipt correction, cutoff 2026-09-01, digest a1e759df9...) onto feeder/Nimo/Mac transcriber — deploy the Nimo worker first so a missing manifest blocks old staged jobs, then feeder/Mac — and return a fresh selection digest confirming zero pre-cutoff/T3 rows in flight; (2) adapt Codex's isolated CTRL-01/CTRL-02 patch (80d96ded) onto the live incident_ledger.py/build-loop gate so closed-gate incidents can still reach worker claim, add a durable repo test, and send a receipt; (3) the browser.py Keychain regression is now escalated to Sean (claude-hourly-2026092816, decide inbox) asking for a one-time Keychain grant for chrome-headless-shell or approval of Codex's narrower option (c) — keep windowed Chrome.app for the Yahoo-authenticated producer children specifically while chrome-headless-shell covers the rest; a Claude session should act on his answer once it lands, it still blocks 5 live incidents; (4) correct board item N-10's state field back to "next" (or record the Tuesday observation if it already landed); (5) keep working the review queue toward OPS-05/MODEL-03/MODEL-04/R-02/R-03/LDR-02/03/04/06 acceptance with Codex.

Contribution to the vision

A business where Sean decides and sees results. Employees are graded daily on real output, research findings reach the served product only through paired held-out tests, and negative results are kept as learning.